kturner
New member
what is the difference in "air intake" and "cold air intake"?
and what is the results of improving each of these?
and what is the results of improving each of these?
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
a cold air intake is basically a metal intake tube thats totally smooth on the inside and usually mounts the air filter in the fender to achieve colder air as it is brought to the engine, a reg intake tube or whatever is what trucks come with stock, its said that a cold air intake adds a little horsepower, i have one, go for it
The terms are interchangable and it depends on the context of how they are used in a write up. In a stock system for example, "air intake" would probably refer to the entire air intake system. Where "cold air intake" would only refer to the portion of the system that only allows air from outside the engine compartment into the system.what is the difference in "air intake" and "cold air intake"?
and what is the results of improving each of these?
thats what i always thought if you get a k&n intake i figured if you go mudd boggin wont that clog i got one and took it off because it startd to sputter wen i went in deep mudd holes and i knew that wasnt good so i put my stock intake back on because it seems to protect the air going into the engine a little better ... i am going with a snorkel kit if i ever do anything like that again89Bronco58,
I have always wondered about the effect of a cold air intake on a truck that gets muddy alot. You obviously wheel yours quite a bit, Do you do deep mud? Doesn't your air filter get caked in mud? Or is it at least the same as stock in that case. I recently filled my air box with mud, so I figured if I had a cold air intake I would have been done.
i got one in my 96 bronco and i noticed a decent changethats what i always thought if you get a k&n intake i figured if you go mudd boggin wont that clog i got one and took it off because it startd to sputter wen i went in deep mudd holes and i knew that wasnt good so i put my stock intake back on because it seems to protect the air going into the engine a little better ... i am going with a snorkel kit if i ever do anything like that again
Apparently, you didn't read what I said or you didn't understand what I said or I know you think you know what I said, but what you need to know is, I didn't say what I ment :blink: .i don't know another about having to have the air mixture "warmed" as previously stated. I have ALWAYS tried to get the air cooler. it is better for performance gains. bottom line is this : "colder air is more dense. the more dense...the more oxygen molecules are packed into it. the more oxygen the better the combustion...." yea and so forth. so i don't know anything about the stock air box being better b/c it mixes. i would preach the opposite because it is very restrictive on its breathing. it has only two thing going for it. 1st is usually plastic and it conducts less heat then some of the other intakes systems. 2nd it has a port that usually leads in from the fender wall so it does try to get outside air. a simple filter from K&N will open up the breathing. imagine going to McDonald's and getting a coffer straw and a regular soda straw. try to breath through both. K&N would be your soda straw; your stock set up would be a coffee straw. it allows you to breath in more air. the only down side to it is that it draws in ambient engine air which is a lot warmer and less dense. the argument is though....is the more air better with the sacrifice of temperature? I would say defiantly yes. i don't think you are trying to drag race your bronco anytime soon. and if you were i think that breathing would come much much later in my worries.. :-B
let me start off with an apology because i wasn't trying to create and arguement or a bashing or what not. perhaps i did misread what you wrote because, ****, we both wrote a lot. it also took me about three times to understand that first line you wrote there @-) anyway....let me just offer an apology. Yes my view points are strictly on performence. thought that was what he wanted. to upgrade from the stock. i wouldn't doubt your knowledge there sirApparently, you didn't read what I said or you didn't understand what I said or I know you think you know what I said, but what you need to know is, I didn't say what I ment :blink: .
No where in that statement did I say a stock system is superior to a aftermarket system when it comes to performance, that is why I said, "That is just a basic writeup and there is a lot more to be said on the subject, like the effects on air temp when the air pressure is increased or decreased."