82&89 New guy

Buschman

New member
Joined
Feb 19, 2020
Messages
10
Location
Ohio
Hi from Ohio. New to this forum stuff. I have been into Broncos for some years now and l still have issue some times. I look forward picking your brains and hoping to help you all if I can. You see I married a 89 Bronco I I to a 1982 full size Bronco. Some might think I was crazy but I just wanted the best of both worlds. I have lots of pics as soon as I figure out how to post them. Thanks and sorry🍺
 

Shaggy

Member
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 19, 2019
Messages
60
Age
43
Location
Arizona
Hi from Ohio. New to this forum stuff. I have been into Broncos for some years now and l still have issue some times. I look forward picking your brains and hoping to help you all if I can. You see I married a 89 Bronco I I to a 1982 full size Bronco. Some might think I was crazy but I just wanted the best of both worlds. I have lots of pics as soon as I figure out how to post them. Thanks and sorry🍺
Welcome. Just use the attach files tab below the reply box to add the pics to your post.
 

Skitter302

Member
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
607
Location
WA
Thats a Good looking Bco II. Like the Wide stance and the 302 engine.
 

miesk5

96 Bronco 5.0
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 18, 2005
Messages
7,776
Location
Coronado, CA

Buschman

New member
Joined
Feb 19, 2020
Messages
10
Location
Ohio
Thanks miesk5 I will gladly take any help I can get and return the help when I can. I’m looking at those links now thanks again.
 

Shaggy

Member
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 19, 2019
Messages
60
Age
43
Location
Arizona
So in that pic, you have a Bronco II body on a fullsize bronco frame?
 

Buschman

New member
Joined
Feb 19, 2020
Messages
10
Location
Ohio
Yes. I found a lot of the measurements and the shape of the frame to be very closely related. The frame is shorten 10.7 inches. The 302 move forward in the frame to get away from the fire wall. Custom built motor and body mounts. Shorter front and rear drive shafts. The wider stance is because the 82 full size axles are wider. All new or rebuilt top to bottom. It’s my second wife you might say. I still can’t understand how the former owners of the 82 full size ran it around so gear bound.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
21,237
Messages
123,594
Members
22,853
Latest member
gpasbronco96
Top